BIS Chief: Stablecoins Unsuitable for Large-Scale Payments…Tokenized Deposits Are the Answer
BIS General Manager Pablo Hernández de Cos recently argued that stablecoins possess fundamental limitations as large-scale payment mechanisms, advocating instead for tokenized deposits. Speaking at the Federal Reserve's Jackson Hole symposium, he suggested that tokenized bank deposits are better suited for everyday transactions while stablecoins may serve niche roles like cross-border payments. This perspective contrasts with U.S. officials who view dollar-pegged stablecoins as a strategic tool to bolster demand for U.S. Treasuries and maintain dollar hegemony. De Cos warned that a mass migration of funds from bank deposits to stablecoins could increase bank funding costs and subsequently raise lending rates for the broader economy. He also highlighted risks regarding the erosion of monetary sovereignty in emerging markets, where widespread stablecoin adoption could undermine local central bank policy transmission. Furthermore, he noted that inconsistent regulatory standards and interoperability challenges across stablecoin issuers complicate their integration into the global financial system. Ultimately, the BIS emphasizes that tokenized deposits offer a more stable path to blockchain-based finance by preserving existing monetary foundations. This debate underscores the growing institutional tension between private stablecoin issuers and central banking authorities regarding the future of digital money.
